Christian Action Network

Daily Terrorism News; WebPage @ www.ChristianAction.Org

U.S. says Qaeda safe haven inaccessible

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Al Qaeda’s safe haven in northwestern Pakistan is largely inaccessible to outside forces and unlikely to be eliminated soon by the U.S. or Pakistani military, top intelligence officials said on Wednesday.  At a hearing in the U.S. House of Representatives, Pentagon intelligence chief James Clapper said the United States was not content to sit still while the militant network blamed for the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington regenerated its strength in North Waziristan. “I think our objective will be to neutralize, not eliminate, but certainly make this safe haven — as we have the others — less safe and less appealing for AQ,” Clapper told a joint session of the House armed services and intelligence committees.  But Clapper, undersecretary of defence for intelligence, presented the task of eliminating al Qaeda’s influence in the region as a long-term project that would hinge on U.S. economic aid to the local populace and contributions of military assistance including sophisticated surveillance equipment to the Pakistani military.  “This is going to be a long-haul process,” he said. “I don’t think we’ll have any demonstrable change within (a) three-year time frame.”  Added Clapper, “It’s not just … putting bombs on targets.”  He and other administration officials spoke to lawmakers about al Qaeda’s emergence in Pakistan after White House homeland security adviser Frances Townsend refused to rule out U.S. military action against al Qaeda. At a separate hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Undersecretary of State Nicholas Burns reiterated the view that the United States would take unilateral action against al Qaeda in Pakistan under certain circumstances.  But he stressed that Washington’s strong preference was to work with the Pakistani government.  Burns also defended Bush’s request for $750 million over five years in new aid to help bring jobs and other development to the lawless region. He said the administration would ask Congress to allow duty-free imports from the border region to aid economic development.  FAILED ACCORD  The Bush administration released unclassified excerpts of a major intelligence report last week that concluded the United States faces a heightened threat from al Qaeda in part because of the Pakistan safe haven.  Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf has deployed more troops to Waziristan where militant tribesmen, accused of harbouring al Qaeda and supporting the Taliban, have stepped up attacks after scrapping a 10-month-old peace deal with the government.  Officials in the House session said Musharraf’s accord with tribal leaders in North Waziristan helped al Qaeda build up its safe haven but defended the agreement as a sincere but failed attempt to control militancy.  Mary Beth Long, acting assistant secretary of defence for international security affairs, told lawmakers that Pakistan now has 100,000 troops in the area.  But officials appeared to play down expectations that stepped up Pakistani military operations would lead to a full-scale assault on al Qaeda sites in a remote mountainous region populated by hostile and heavily armed tribes.  “Al Qaeda is now in a part of Pakistan that is largely inaccessible to Pakistani forces, the Pakistani government. Always has been. And it is a very difficult operating environment for them,” said Edward Gistaro, the top U.S. intelligence analyst on transnational threats.  “It is just a very difficult environment for outside forces to operate in,” he added.

Advertisements

July 27, 2007 - Posted by | Blogroll, Homeland security, news, personal, politics, random, religion, Terrorism, Terrorism In The U.S., Terrorism News, Uncategorized, War-On-Terror

1 Comment »

  1. why repeat the mistakes of history?If they had read any they would know that the British army,at that time the most formidable military machine,spent more than a century trying to subdue the afghans,to no avail,the weapons may have improved but the landscape remains the same as it was then, and it is wholly in favour of the defenders, the British army should know better!

    Comment by R CROSS | July 29, 2007 | Reply


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: